[Previous] Magee's anti-fallibilism and anti-morality | Home | [Next] Marriage

Sweet Nothings

People acknowledge that a "sweet nothing" is a "nothing"; it has no content. So how can it be considered sweet?

Elliot Temple on September 19, 2008

Comments (3)

Same way a piece of candy with no nutritive value can be considered sweet, I suppose.

Not that this vindicates the 'sweet nothing' concept all that much.

Sonic Charmer

Anonymous at 4:45 PM on September 19, 2008 | #1527
It'd be sweeter if instead of saying 'sweet nothings' they just said nothing.

Anonymous at 8:19 PM on September 19, 2008 | #1528
Sweet nothings are not nothing. They are phatic utterances: vocalizations that have the purpose of binding people together socially or lovingly.

rlubbock

Anonymous at 5:27 AM on September 20, 2008 | #1529

What do you think?

(This is a free speech zone!)