From Twitter.
Andrew Adams
What are your thoughts on having harsher regulations? E.g., making it harder for mentally ill to access guns, etc?
Elliot Temple
I favor much less regulation of guns. I am especially opposed to "mental illness" laws: http://szasz.com/manifesto.html
http://fallibleideas.com/books#szasz
Andrew Adams
I will read up on him and will get back to you. In meanwhile I'll ask you this question, if mental disorders could be detected like. heart diseases, or kidney diseases are detected, would you favor regulation on people who show signs of severe unstable moods or psycopathy?
[quoting from Szasz manifesto] "Classifying thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as diseases is a logical and semantic error". I have to disagree. The brain is a biological organism and the diseases related to it are well studied and well known. Would you give a gun to someone who showed..signs if psycopathy or borderline personality disorder for example?
Elliot Temple
i am open to regulation of medically detectable defects, like requiring someone with testably bad vision to wear glasses when driving.
it would need to be an actual medical test like for cancer, not a person judging someone's mood. preferably detectable at autopsy.
Andrew Adams
I'm glad we agree on that. I come from a human behavioral biology background, and what Szasz claims seems bizzare. I will read his writings.
Elliot Temple
Szasz agrees with that too, FYI. Though he would point out that would be a physical brain illness, not an illness of a mind.
Minds have bad ideas, which are different than illnesses.
Andrew Adams
And why brain, which is a biological organism like heart and kidney, can't cause a problem that can be called a disease? It seems to me that the fact that we can't diagnose mental diseases the way we diagnose other organs, due to its complexity, makes you to believe we can't have mental disorders. Imagine you had diabetes, and for some reason science couldn't yet see what's going on, but certainly we got all the diagnoses that a diabetic person has. Wouldn't be absurd to not call that a disease?
Elliot Temple
There are brain diseases, but they aren't "mental illnesses", they are "brain illnesses". And schizophrenia and autism are myths.
Though, as with many myths, there is some true element: some people behave in socially-disapproved ways and others want to stigmatize them.
With depression: true that some ppl r VERY sad, have MAJOR life problems. False that their bad situation, bad coping ideas, etc, is illness
it doesn't "make" me believe anything, it's one problematic issue, among many, for psychiatry.
"mind disorders" (bad ideas, a disordered mind) is a problem, but is not the same category of thing as cancer.
i think this is too hard to follow on twitter with every message divided into multiple tweets. could you reply on my blog comments?
Andrew Adams
If you hallucinate and hear sounds in your head, is that due to bad ideas? Or the way your brain is wired?
Sure. Under the same page you posted the longer answer?
Elliot Temple
i made a fresh page: http://curi.us/2047-discussion
Andrew Adams
Can we please communicate through the direct message? That's much faster and we can engage each other.
Elliot Temple
i would prefer the blog. i will talk here if you're unwilling and you give me permission to quote anything here.
Andrew Adams
You can quote anything you want.
So let's see. You believe brain is a biological organ right? No souls and superstitious there, correct?
Elliot Temple
yes
Andrew Adams
And a biological thing can get fucked up, as we are seeing with all the other things. RIght?
Elliot Temple
the mind is software and the details of the brain are irrelevant to the mind in the same way that you can run the same software on different PCs.
yes brain damage is a thing, just like e.g. a ram stick going bad.
Andrew Adams
Okay this is where I think you're wrong, with all due respect. I'll explain. The software is there because of the way the brain is wired. It's not something separate built on top of those neurons. Your behavior is due to the wiring. That's why if the wiring gets screwed up, you have no way to upgrade the software. Those two are not independent.
It's like saying to a diabetes, person: man stop it with the insulin thing. It's getting really annoying.
Elliot Temple
How did you find me? Have you read David Deutsch?
Andrew Adams
I found you through Deutsch. I haven't read his books yet, but I've listened to his interviews and are somewhat aware of his positions.
Elliot Temple
The computer's behavior is due to the data on the disks, the wiring of the CPU, etc. It's not something separate either. If you hit computer components with a hammer, it affects the software that's running.
So the cases remain analogous.
hardware and software bugs are different things. both exist. right?
and there are also features which some people don't like and call bugs
Andrew Adams
But software is just instructions for the cpu, which is the hardware. If you damage the cpu, the hardware is not gonna perform as usual. Do you agree?
The software I meant
Elliot Temple
i agree that hitting a cpu or brain with a hammer can screw up the software currently running.
Andrew Adams
The software is not gonna perform as ususal
Okay. Then if the wiring is screwed up due to anomalies that we observe throughout the biological organisms, does that make that make what's happening an illness?
Elliot Temple
if there's physical brain damage, that's an illness or injury.
Andrew Adams
But it doesn't have to be a hammer hitting your brain. It's more subtle than that. The wiring can be screwed up.
It's a biological thing again. Anomalies exist.
Elliot Temple
Yes, for example in my non-expert understanding, Alzheimer's involves some brain damage which causes some memory loss issues.
Andrew Adams
You don't have to hit it from outside to screw it up.
Sure
It's the wiring that gets screwed up, hence bugs in the software.
Environment can influence your wiring.
Elliot Temple
for example, an environment with radiation. sure.
Andrew Adams
But some disorders have proven to have like 80% genetical cause.
Elliot Temple
correlation isn't causation.
Andrew Adams
It's a causation study.
Elliot Temple
have you read the studies you're referring to?
Andrew Adams
yes
Elliot Temple
ok link one you think contains no flaws.
which involves a typical "mental illness"
Andrew Adams
Behavioral geneticists did experiments with schizophrenia. They did it on twins that were adopted at birth.
I'll find the links and send it to you
Elliot Temple
i've read studies too, as has Szasz. Schizophrenia will work fine.
just one, please.
Andrew Adams
I mean even if it's done by environment, doesn't make your argument stronger. Do you agree? No matter the cause, something is screwed up up there.
Sure.
Elliot Temple
i don't think i've stated my case. i began earlier by saying that hardware and software problems are different categories of things, and both are real. do you agree?
Andrew Adams
I don't thing software is separate from hardware in the brain. All the behaviors we have is due to neurons connections to each other. As I said, software is just a set of instructions for the cpu, but the difference in the brain is that the software is not programmed separately, but also hardwired in the neurons. Say you're kind person, right? I can theoratically open your mind, change a few neuron, and you become evil. We could do that if we had the technology right?
And again, whether the behaviour is shaped by genes or environment is irrelavant.
Elliot Temple
you can also open up a computer and edit stuff to change what it does. that's the same thing.
Andrew Adams
So do you agree neurons getting screwed up is not really different from brain damage?
Elliot Temple
you can arrange your neurons in a bad configuration by forming bad ideas. you can make unwise life decisions, believe a bunch of crap from a cult, and it physically affects the arrangement of your neurons. this – people having ideas, for better or worse – is different than Alheizmers or brain cancer.
Andrew Adams
No!!! You shouldn't be an evil person to have your wiring screwed up!
Elliot Temple
the data in a computer can be screwed up due to a hard disk malfunction or due to software that writes bad data. one is a hardware error, one is a software error. they are different things.
Andrew Adams
Why do you assume only evil things are the only environmental factors that cause brain problems?
Elliot Temple
i didn't assume that. i'm trying to say that bad ideas exist. you seem to be resisting this and saying it's all just neurons.
i'm trying to use the simplest, most clearcut cases as initial examples.
people get indoctrinated into cults, and that's not an illness. right?
Andrew Adams
I'm not denying people can believe in bad ideologies and get brainwashed. But for some it's just the wiring that can be genetically or by a certain environment or by nutrition for example screwed up.
Do all people that have diabeties have had bad diets in their life?
Absolutely not.
It's sometimes merely genetic.
Elliot Temple
i'm not trying to say all people, at this time. i'm trying to establish a category exists and some stuff is in it. some people are healthy and join a cult and it's a big mistake and it has some physical affect on their neurons (e.g. they form memories of cult ideas, which then physically exist in their brain), but it's still not an illness or brain damage. it's a different thing. right?
Andrew Adams
If you were born with one of your neurons for example only one centimeter to one side, you could become a more violent person. Do you agree that?
It's just biology.
There was a man that murdered his whole family and then went to street and mass murdered a bunch of people. They opened his brain for autopsy and they found out he had two tumors in is brain.
and tumors are not the only thing that can cause that.
Elliot Temple
can you answer my question?
Andrew Adams
You can be genetically born with some kind of screwed up neurons.
I answered it. I agree that ideologies can change your neurons.
But those are not the only cases.
Some people can't just help it.
It's like saying to a diabetic person to stop it with his insulins
Elliot Temple
And you agree that ideologies are not brain damage or illness, even when a neuron changes?
Andrew Adams
brain damage IS chagne of neurons
Elliot Temple
so you think that all people adopting bad ideologies count as brain damaged and ill?
Andrew Adams
Not all changes are brain damage, but brain damage is a change in neurons
You can change your neurons and become too generous and kind
Elliot Temple
so you agree that a person can adopt a cult ideology, have neurons change, but they are not ill and are not brain damaged?
Andrew Adams
First, the fact that they have done evil things could be due to the way their neurons were wired in the first place. I mean, couldn't choose your original brain wiring could you? Second, there is a difference between adopting cult like behavior and the diseases that are categorized as mentally ill. People get moody, see things, get depressed, get anxious. These are not things you see on TV or cults and adopt.
Elliot Temple
Why won't you give a straight answer?
Andrew Adams
The fact that they first joined the cult is due to the wiring of their brain.
Elliot Temple
do you think most people are brain-damaged or not?
Andrew Adams
Yeah
By that definition
I don't beleive in free will
You are nothing but the wiring of your brain
Elliot Temple
do you think most people have brain illnesses/diseases? and so you would call most people "mentally ill"?
Andrew Adams
and 90% of the environment you grew up in you didn't choose
Most people have different wirings that most don't lead to extreme behavior, but some of them are extereme. So all people are mentally ill, but only some are in the extreme side.
There is no such thing as perfect wiring
Elliot Temple
you're not using words in the way psychiatry in general does, nor the way Szasz does. this makes the discussion difficult.
Andrew Adams
Some are lucky and don't get bad wirings due to anomalies.
Some due
Do you believe in genetics?
Elliot Temple
i believe i have genes.
that question isn't very clear.
Andrew Adams
and do you believe genes determine the wiring of your initial brain?
Elliot Temple
mostly, yes. there may be some other factors in the womb.
Andrew Adams
prenatal effects true. Which you didn't choose.
So if I'm a person who by chance are born by a screwed up wiring.
am i considered ill if my behavior lead to extreme bad causes that is hurful?
Elliot Temple
are you a native English speaker?
Andrew Adams
No
I'm typing very fast too, my spelling and grammar are not as bad
Elliot Temple
I don't think your genes control your whole life. I think people make decisions in their life, and they're responsible for lots of what happens in their life.
Andrew Adams
But the wiring that you originally inherit is genetical, right?
Elliot Temple
Your genes create an initial brain with an intelligent mind. They set that up. If they didn't do that, you'd be screwed. But once you have that, then you have a chance to think for yourself.
The operation of your intelligent mind, not your genes, control most of what happens in your life, such as what ideas you accept.
To understand a person's life, you need to analyze how intelligence works, rather than genes.
And to know much about a person, you usually need to look at their ideas not their neurons.
Andrew Adams
But you are denying that the early years of your life and the original wiring can have huge impact.
If you were born with a set of neurons that made you a little more agressive in school, or a little less IQ, or little more depressed.
Elliot Temple
The original wiring has the impact: creates intelligence software. Your early years have a big impact because your intelligence is actively learning and thinking during that time.
Andrew Adams
Exactly
Elliot Temple
IQ is a myth.
Andrew Adams
Did you choose to be born to your family?
Elliot Temple
no.
Andrew Adams
So those crucial early years that you didn't have control over may set your neurons up in a way that can lead you to join a cult in the future. Or the way your original neurons were determined by your genes.
Elliot Temple
Having bad parents is hard and I think they can have some partial responsibility for what their children do, especially at younger ages.
However, you can still make good life choices even if you have bad parents. Especially once you're an adult and free to control your own life.
Andrew Adams
Is it possible that someone is born with a brain that is genetically wired a little screwed up?
Elliot Temple
You have power over what happens in your life. Everything isn't determined by fate.
Andrew Adams
Not fate, but genes and the environment you were didn't choose at early lives.
Elliot Temple
I don't think anyone is born a little screwed up, no. Either you have functioning intelligence software or you don't. There's no such thing as 95% intelligent.
That's not Szasz's idea btw. It was developed by David Deutsch and I.
Andrew Adams
What kind if reasoning is that? Are all people the same height or midget?
The brain is biological
Elliot Temple
It has to do with universality, which is covered in DD's books.
Andrew Adams
What universality?
Universality of computation?
Elliot Temple
there are other types of universality besides computation, such as universal knowledge creators (intelligences).
Andrew Adams
If you were born autistic, could you be the person you are now?
Elliot Temple
i think autism is a myth.
Andrew Adams
In what sense?
Elliot Temple
some parents don't like their children, and fight with them. they call those children "autistic" to stigmatize them.
Andrew Adams
What?! Are you serious?
Elliot Temple
it has nothing to do with a brain problem. it's just a disagreement, a moral conflict.
this is DD's view too.
Andrew Adams
Have you met an autistic person?
Elliot Temple
i have met a person who has been called autistic, yes.
Andrew Adams
Well, attributing all your ideas to DD doesn't make them right.
So you think a moral conflict caused that?
Elliot Temple
why don't you read this and point out which statement is false? http://web.archive.org/web/20030620082122/http://www.tcs.ac:80/Articles/DDAspidistraSyndrome.html
DD's views are not automatically true, but you shouldn't call them unserious.
Andrew Adams
Asperger is not autism
Elliot Temple
so do you think DD is correct about everything in that article?
Andrew Adams
what year was this written?
Elliot Temple
1997 like it says
it doesn't matter.
Andrew Adams
It matters!
https://www.webmd.com/brain/autism/tc/aspergers-syndrome-symptoms#1
Read this
20 years ago
Elliot Temple
what about it?
Andrew Adams
Totally different symptoms than what dd was mocking 20 years ago. A lot has changed.
Elliot Temple
no, it's the same thing as before, e.g. "Talk a lot, usually about a favorite subject. One-sided conversations are common. Internal thoughts are often verbalized." is exactly the kind of thing DD was mocking.
how is talking a lot about your favorite subject an illness?
Andrew Adams
Asperger they say is a mild case of autism, so symptomes are the watered down symptomes of autism. If you have ever seen an autistic child, how could you say it's due to a moral conflict?
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/discovery-of-18-new-autism-linked-genes-may-point-to-new-treatments/
Scientific american 2017
Elliot Temple
what exactly do you think could not be a parent-child conflict?
Andrew Adams
regarding autism
Elliot Temple
by autism-linked genes they mean correlated. as before, if you have a causation study, provide a link.
Andrew Adams
Let's say even it is due to parents. Does that make the person ill due to his parent's actions that he didn't choose?
Elliot Temple
in order for something to be shown to cause autism, autism would also need to be carefully defined.
Andrew Adams
How about the way they all look and act?
Elliot Temple
i don't see what hating your parents, and not being a total conformist, has to do with being ill.
Andrew Adams
that's due to moral conflict too?
Elliot Temple
i don't know what looks and actions you're referring to.
Andrew Adams
But you were saying everyone can choose the right path and stuff
Elliot Temple
in my understanding, the people called "autistic" look and act in a wide variety of different ways. they aren't all the same.
Andrew Adams
Just watch autistic kids on youtube
Elliot Temple
i have
Andrew Adams
And you think they are all due to bad parentin?
parenting?
Elliot Temple
in short, yes.
Andrew Adams
Okay even let's say you're right and autism is 0% genetical and due to moral conflict of parents.
Elliot Temple
and in many cases, i don't think anything is wrong with the kid.
i think the kid is fine and the parent just doesn't like him.
Andrew Adams
They can't have eye contact, they don't react facially or understand emotions, they can't think big picture,
I've met them and they all had the same problems.
You can't deny it's problem
Elliot Temple
some people don't like to make the socially normal amount of eye contact. i don't see anything wrong with that.
Andrew Adams
Do you believe they are abnormal?
Elliot Temple
some people called autistic seem completely normal in the videos on youtube. others seem abnormal, yes, but i don't see anything bad about not making eye contact.
i don't think everyone should be a conformist who spends their whole life trying really hard to fit in and be normal.
learning what facial expressions to make, in what situations, so that people think you're normal is a skill. some people are more interested in other skills.
Andrew Adams
Is there any mental disease that you attribute to genetics?
Elliot Temple
no. all the ones with genetic, disease or injury causes are already called regular illnesses, like Alzheimer's, not "mental illnesses" like schizophrenia and autism
Andrew Adams
How about down syndrome?
Elliot Temple
that's a defective chromosone. regular illness.
Andrew Adams
So genes can get screwed up but not neurons in the brain
?
Elliot Temple
people are very mean to down syndrome persons similar to how they treat "autistic" people, though. that part is similar.
Andrew Adams
So genes can get screwed up but not neurons in the brain?
Elliot Temple
bad ideas aren't caused by genes.
good ideas also aren't caused by genes. genes set up intelligence software. from there, you have to look at how intelligence and ideas work, not at genes.
it's like if you buy a house, you don't blame the construction workers for when you yell at your wife in the house.
the genes are the construction workers.
they built the brain in the first place, but that doesn't mean they're controlling it later.
Andrew Adams
So a gene can make you like a down syndrome kid but the same gene structure that code for neurons can't in any way make you more aggressive or psychopathic?
Why do you assume that?
Elliot Temple
i'm not assuming it, it's implied by what's currently known about epistemology, computation, science, etc
i've studied it extensively.
Andrew Adams
Send me a study that says genes have no affect in how the neurons function later in life
Elliot Temple
my argument doesn't consist of a study.
it consists of understanding concepts like universality.
and putting them together to help you analyze and interpret various evidence, studies, behaviors, etc
why don't you send me a correct genes cause (not correlated) mental illness study? you said you had one. i don't think they exist. prove me wrong?
Andrew Adams
http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1984-06924-001
Elliot Temple
if you want to understand my argument, you should start by reading DD, szasz and http://bactra.org/weblog/520.html
Andrew Adams
I just sent you a scientific study
You are taking two people and denying what the whole community of geneticists and neuroscientists beleive
that genes have affects, if not most
You believe a down syndrome kid can be born like that due to a single gene, but the millions of genes that code for intelligence have no way of affecting the way nerurons will function in future life
Elliot Temple
i'm not judging which people have how much authority, i'm looking at arguments
i've gotten a copy of the study you sent and will take a look
Andrew Adams
Just read the abstract
Elliot Temple
did you read the whole paper?
Andrew Adams
I'm not saying genes are 100%
Yeah. I even studied that in class at stanford
Elliot Temple
ok, why would i only read the abstract?
i don't understand
Andrew Adams
but even if they are 5%
Ok read the whole thing if you want.
Elliot Temple
not everything comes in amounts. let's talk about how many houses are haunted by a ghost. you can't just say "well it may not be 100% but at least 5%"
Andrew Adams
But you are the one who says the affect is zero
I'm just saying even if that's the case, that it's zero percent, that most scientist would caught at you because of it, can lead to mental illnesses that are not only caused by your actions.
5% i meant here*
laugh*
The same way a single gene can cause down syndrome
why is brain an exception to biology?
explain that to me?
Elliot Temple
i read the abstract. it says it's a meta correlation study. that's what "concordance" means. i also looked at the start and it doesn't attempt to define "schizophrenia".
i agree that many people would laugh at me. that's not an argument.
Andrew Adams
tell me why a singel gene can cause down syndrome but not affects neurons?
Elliot Temple
down syndrome is different than you think.
let's try to stick to one thing at a time. this study first.
Andrew Adams
No you refused to give a study so let's talk
Elliot Temple
i'm talking about the study you gave.
Andrew Adams
yeah what about it?
Elliot Temple
you said it was a causation (not correlation) study, but the abstract says it's a correlation study.
Andrew Adams
How is it correlation?
Elliot Temple
it studies concordances (correlations) between genes and being diagnosed with schizophrenia.
Andrew Adams
They separate twins at birth, and measure if they both get schizophrenia
how's that correlation?
Identical twins
But you didn't tell me how down syndrome is different
Elliot Temple
the point of a twin study is to say they have the same genes, so if they both get schizophrenia that's evidence that schizophrenia is caused by genes. right?
one thing at a time please.
Andrew Adams
Ok
yeah
Elliot Temple
and they separate them. cuz if they are raised by the same parents, you could blame the parents.
Andrew Adams
Sure
Or the environement
Elliot Temple
that's what a correlation study means.
it's saying "when X happened, Y happened".
or when X happened, Y is more likely to happen
X is having certain genes, and Y is being diagnosed with schizophrenia
Andrew Adams
So two identical twins get separated at birth, and most get schizophrenia later on.
Is it chance that all those parents raised them schizophrenic?
Elliot Temple
it's wrote down when X happened, and wrote down when Y happened, and we analyzed the data and then we found a correlation.
do you understand that this is a correlation study?
Andrew Adams
It's a correlation yeah. But controlled.
How can you explain this study?
Elliot Temple
ok, so why did you tell me it wasn't a correlation study?
did you not know what correlation means until today?
Andrew Adams
Why does it matter?
tell me
How do you explain the study?
Elliot Temple
you were mistaken. i'm trying to find out what happened.
Andrew Adams
Of course they're not gonna find out genes by twin separation
Elliot Temple
we're having a debate, and you were wrong, and then you don't want to talk about it at all?
Andrew Adams
So my mistake of saying causation ruins the whole study for you?
Explain the study to me
Elliot Temple
i'm trying to find out what's going on. why did this mistake happen? i don't know what it means yet.
if you didn't know what a correlation is before today, then your understanding of every study you read in the past is unreliable.
regarding correlations, you should read this: http://bactra.org/weblog/520.html
Andrew Adams
Explain the study
Elliot Temple
this article will explain to you a lot of things about correlations so you can understand the study better.
Andrew Adams
You lost the debate so you're trying to attack me personally
Explain teh study
Elliot Temple
i can't explain it to you because you don't have the background knowledge to understand the issues. you need to learn more. when i tried to give explanations earlier, you didn't understand. you need to read more. read this to find the answer to the study: http://bactra.org/weblog/520.html
Andrew Adams
You're the one who said you don't go by scientific studies and you have your own rules.
Elliot Temple
i don't go by flawed studies when i know the flaws.
the webpage explains some of the flaws with correlation studies.
Andrew Adams
Explain the study to me then
Why when they're separated they still get schizophrenia?
Elliot Temple
there are lots of possibilities. i can't tell you exactly what happened. it's not known.
if you read the webpage, http://bactra.org/weblog/520.html then you can find out what some explanations of the study are.
Andrew Adams
And you still haven't answered why down syndrome can be caused by a single gene but genes have no affect on your neurons' functions in future life.
Elliot Temple
we're still talking about this.
and the answer has to do with universality, which you haven't read about yet.
Andrew Adams
Sure because you can't answer that
Tell me about it
Elliot Temple
i think you're getting angry and impatient, and it's very hard to give you a lecture covering thousands of pages of material, requiring years of study, when you're in a bad mood and hostile.
Andrew Adams
So neurons are not bound to biology because of universality?
Elliot Temple
minds are universal knowledge creators. there can't be minds with 99% of the universal repertoire b/c there is a jump to universality.
but you don't know what this means. it's in BoI.
Andrew Adams
Minds are just a biological organism that can get flawed due to genes.
Elliot Temple
that isn't a counter-argument. it doesn't say why my understanding of the jump to universality is wrong, or my epistemology is wrong.
Andrew Adams
So you can't summarize your universality argument in 2-3 sentences?
Elliot Temple
minds are universal knowledge creators. there can't be minds with 99% of the universal repertoire b/c there is a jump to universality.
that is 2 sentences.
Andrew Adams
Okay
Elliot Temple
i can't teach you the contents of the book BoI in 2-3 sentences.
Andrew Adams
Alright. Well, I enjoyed the conversation. I'll read that. I had no intention of fighting or something like that. And I don't debate to win.
I admit that my knowledge is limited and I can be wrong. So what you say might be right.
I'll read it
Elliot Temple
you should read this to learn about correlations http://bactra.org/weblog/520.html
it's very important to this field.
Andrew Adams
Are you angry?
Elliot Temple
no
Andrew Adams
Okay
Elliot Temple
in a gene-environment interaction, sometimes it wouldn't happen at all unless BOTH the gene and that part of the environment were there. in that case, it's incorrect to say the gene causes 40% of it. it couldn't happen at all without the environmental factor. what you have to do is figuring out what the gene actually does, and what part of the environment is involved, what the causal mechanism is.
the problem with the twin studies is they don't do this. they don't know the answer.
plus they are correlating with schizophrenia diagnoses, which is different than schizophrenia (which isn't even defined)
there are no studies which do this with autism or schizophrenia. all the published studies are just correlations without understanding it.
an example of a gene-environment interaction is: a gene makes infants cry more during the first 3 months, and then does nothing. parents in our culture are meaner to infants that cry more. this meanness results in higher rates of ADHD diagnoses in school later. correlation studies would report this as finding a gene for ADHD, but that's incorrect.
Andrew Adams
I understand the study is not perfect and it's a correlation. You didn't expect them to find the actual genes in a twin studies did you?
Elliot Temple
you said you had a study about the causes.
i knew there aren't any. that's why i challenged you.
Andrew Adams
And I didn't quote this studies as the final truth, but a little bit of evidence that genes play some role.
Elliot Temple
it isn't any evidence. it's the same as the ADHD study example.
there are many other problems with correlation studies, which you can learn about at the link.
Andrew Adams
To say that correlation study completely meaningless is absurd. It sheds some lights on the topic for furthur studies.
Elliot Temple
calling something absurd isn't an argument.
look at the ADHD example. it sheds NO light on ADHD
Andrew Adams
I explained why it's absurd in the nest sentence
next
Elliot Temple
claiming it sheds light is not an argument that it sheds light. that's an assertion.
Andrew Adams
I'm not here to defend that study again. You've gotten preoccupied with that and have ignored all other things I've said.
Elliot Temple
you are defending that type of study
Andrew Adams
You told me about universality and how it makes brain different from other organisms
Elliot Temple
but you don't have any arguments which address what i said or the link i gave.
Andrew Adams
I'm gonna study that
Elliot Temple
ok
Andrew Adams
So universality will explain to me why down syndrome is affected by a gene by neurons' functions in the future life of a person are not affected by any gene. I'm not challenging it. Just making sure that's what you're saying.
but*
Elliot Temple
it is a part of the explanation. there's a lot of things to understand.
Andrew Adams
What else?
Elliot Temple
i think it works better to start with IQ and why that's wrong.
Andrew Adams
Why IQ?
IQ is just a test
Elliot Temple
because the idea behind IQ is that some people are 10% smarter than other people.
Andrew Adams
What does it have to do with mental illness?
Elliot Temple
and this is due to genes or hardware.
and we can use universality to see that that is false.
it's a simpler argument than trying to talk about down's syndrome.
Andrew Adams
Some people could be wired to be faster at learning or doing mathematical computations but I don't believe in quantifying it the way IQ does.
Elliot Temple
from understanding universality, we can find out that all people are capable of learning the same things.
that includes people who are claimed to have lower IQs or down syndrome.
their genes gave them the same capabilities as everyone in else in terms of what things they can learn, what knowledge they can create, what they can think of.
Andrew Adams
But can it be harder for some people?
Elliot Temple
no
it's harder for people with brain damage like alzheimer's. and it's harder for people after they have bad ideas.
Elliot Temple
but they aren't born with it being harder for them (except in RARE cases of being born brain damaged)
Andrew Adams
And what's the evidence for universality?
Elliot Temple
it's more a logical argument. but we have built universal computers.
Andrew Adams
Right
But we have faster computers, right?
Some have better specs
Elliot Temple
this makes almost no difference to the lives of most people
Andrew Adams
But you just said all people learn at the same rate
Elliot Temple
no, i said they are capable of learning the same things
and most people don't max out their CPU
they use maybe 10% of their brain's computing capacity
Elliot Temple
so it doesn't matter if it's slightly slower or faster.
Andrew Adams
Oh okay I get what you mean by universality
Elliot Temple
b/c there is more they aren't using
Andrew Adams
All things that compute are eventually capable of learning all things that there is
Elliot Temple
and no one cares if you write a great book in 37 months or 36 months. being slightly faster isn't what makes a genius.
Andrew Adams
So the fact that some people are faster is biological?
Elliot Temple
that is possible, but it doesn't really matter.
stuff like "autism" isn't thinking 3% slower than someone else.
Andrew Adams
Oh okay.
Elliot Temple
and bad ideas make people 1000x better or worse at thinking.
or good ideas
so it's the ideas that are important
Andrew Adams
Gotcha
Thank you
Elliot Temple
sure
:)
Andrew Adams
I'll read more on it
Elliot Temple
i don't know a lot about down syndrome. it's possible they think significantly slower and it matters. more likely, i think, is that a brain defect causes random errors. genes can't control you like telling you to be a Republican, but if genes build your brain wrong it can cause random data to be deleted or changed sometimes which makes it harder and slower to think (you have to spend more time double checking things, kinda like using checksums)
random error doesn't make someone have certain opinions or be aggressive.
i don't think stuff like "autism" and "schizophrenia" is related to physical brain problems, but down syndrome could be.
i don't think it's like the "mental illnesses" from what i know.
it's more objective and consistent, and has a medical test.
instead of just talking to someone and then lots of different psychiatrists would reach different conclusions about the same person.
Andrew Adams
I see
watch this please and let me know what you think
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RG5fN6KrDJE&index=7&list=PL848F2368C90DDC3D
Elliot Temple
90 minutes? hmm. will you sign up for my newsletter and discussion forum in return? :)
Andrew Adams
First 40 minutes would suffice actually
Sure!
Elliot Temple
awesome
fallibleideas.com/newsletter
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/fallible-ideas/info
i may not watch for a few days. i'll post some comments to my forum or blog.
i will also get this conversation posted somewhere
Andrew Adams
Just signed up for the newsletter.
Cool!
Do I have to have a yahoo account to join the group?
Elliot Temple
no, you can also send a blank email to [email protected] and then confirm
Andrew Adams
Awesome just joined the group too
I look forward to your thought on the video
Elliot Temple
ok :)
Andrew Adams
Hi, this just crossed my mind. What do you think of savants?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2HiLtgGdVg
Like these two guys for example
Elliot Temple
brains are computers. mostly "savants" do stuff that's actually pretty easy to do with a PC like memorizing things or math. it's just a bit of a quirk to organize their mind differently than most people and are able to use some hardware features that other people are bad at using.
most people don't want to do the things savants do. they aren't interested.
some people memorize hundreds of pokemon names and various facts about them all. but if you do digits of pi, people get way more impressed for some reason.
others memorize hundreds of bible quotes. remembering lots of stuff is actually pretty common.
Andrew Adams
I see. Thanks.