[Previous] Competing Security/Police Forces Under Anarcho-capitalism | Home | [Next] Bayes and Induction

Elliot Temple on March 31, 2009

Comments (2)

I take it you mean they're not accurate indicators *of intelligence*, right? Because I'd say they're 100% accurate indicators of IQ (a fairly useless thing to bother indicating).

- Richard

Anonymous at 7:22 PM on May 31, 2009 | #1775
Has he repeated the test later as an adult and taken it seriously, he would have scored 140 or more.

Anonymous at 3:08 AM on July 11, 2009 | #1833

What do you think?

(This is a free speech zone!)